It’s time to vote again this Tuesday, November 4. My slatecard for your delectation below.

Once again, check your polling place because it may have changed. They managed to avoid implementing instant runoff voting so that they can make it more likely that Newsom will win in a later runoff election. We have to prove them wrong by bringing out the voters in greater numbers if the runoff occurs.

As always, I’d love to hear your opinion about why you agree or disagree with my recommendations below.

That’s what democracy looks like!

Peace,

Will
——-
Will’s November 4 Election Slatecard

[* by the important ones]

* Mayor -> Tom Ammiano
[but most important is to vote for anyone but Newsom to keep him from getting 50%+ of the vote so that the left can unite for the runoff election to defeat Newsom, info on Newsom’s record at http://www.gruesomenewsom.org/]

* District Attorney -> Terence Hallinan

Sheriff -> Michael Hennessey

Props A – F -> I don’t feel strongly, but probably yes
Prop G -> Yes
* Prop H -> Yes [this one is important for police accountability]
Prop I -> Yes
Prop J -> Yes
Prop K -> Yes
* Prop L -> Yes [reasonable minimum wage]
* Prop M -> NO!
Prop N -> Don’t know

The website for people opposed to Gruesome Gavin Newsom’s mayoral candidacy in San Francisco is now available at http://gruesomenewsom.org/

Join us for an “Any Mayor But Newsom” smart mob on Sunday, October 5, at the Castro Street Fair. (Forward this to friends!)

We’ll gather between 11:00am and 1:00pm at the corner of 18th and Castro, then have a renaming ritual at 1:00pm at Harvey’s (since Harvey Milk would be rolling in his grave at the Newsom signs affixed to a business named in his honor).

Need the scoop on why Newsom shouldn’t be mayor? Check this out:

Sup. Gavin Newsom’s record on the Board of Supervisors is that of a corporate, downtown developer, and landlord puppet. Nearly every neighborhood or tenant group which appears before the Board of Supervisors can count on Newsom voting against them and with his corporate and real estate donors and handlers every time. Newsom’s votes have clearly reflected a Supervisor out of touch with neighborhood interests and strongly supportive of the Residential Builder’s Association (RBA), developers, landlords and corporate interests of every kind. Newsom himself is a developer of “live/work” units and a landlord who has evicted tenants for no-fault reasons.

Any other candidate would be much better than Newsom.

Newsom does not support rent control and will work to repeal it! He gets a lot of good press (especially on Channel 2 because Ross McGowan is an investor in Newsom’s businesses), spends a lot of money, looks good and has good corporate and political handlers. But the bottom line is that he votes against the average person, neighborhood interests, renters, and voters of San Francisco nearly every opportunity he gets and in favor of the corporate development, business and real estate interests.
NEWSOM’S ANTI-NEIGHBORHOOD AND ANTI-TENANT VOTES

* July 22, 2003: Voted against proposal to strengthen rent control by giving tenants more seats on the SF Rent Board.

* November, 2002: One of 2 Supervisors (Hall) to support massive condominium conversion and rent control repeal measure (Prop R) on the November 2002 ballot.

* October 7, 2002: One of 3 Supervisors (Hall, Maxwell) to rubber-stamp all of Willie Brown’s nominations to the Planning Commission and Board of Permit Appeals.

* March, 2002: Prohibited from voting on limits to new “live/work” units because he is a developer of “live/work” units.

* April 15, 2002: Voted against controls on “big box” projects, like Ikea or Home Depot. Specifically voted against neighborhood notice and approval requirements.

* March 18, 2002: Opposed requiring developers to include affordable housing in their developments (Inclusionary Housing Ordinance).

* February 11, 2002: One of 2 Supervisors (Hall) to vote against additional protections for tenants, especially senior tenants, from evictions and pass-through of capital improvements.

* August 20, 2001: Again voted against requiring developers to include more affordable housing. (He and Hall opposed resolution to Planning Commission).

* July 23, 2001: Voted against public power. He and Hall voted to prevent the voters from deciding on the ballot whether or not we should have public power.

* July 9, 2001: Voted against limiting evictions for condo conversions. One of 3 Supervisors (Hall, Yee) to vote in support of the Mayor’s veto of Tenant protection Legislation.

* April 2, 2001: Voted to allow evictions of seniors under the Ellis Act. One of 3 Supervisors (Hall, Yee) voting against a resolution urging the State Legislature to amend the Ellis Act to prevent the eviction of senior tenants under Ellis.

* February 20, 2001: Voted against a temporary ban on rent increases for capital improvements.

SOME EARLIER NEWSOM VOTES (Compared to Bay Guardian Positions)

(Prior To 2001, Newsom — a landlord — was prohibited from voting on most landlord/tenant measures. In 2001, the conflict of interest law was changed, allowing him to vote. During this time he could not vote on a measure to limit OMI evictions of senior, disabled and terminally ill tenants, but indicated if he could he would vote against those protections.
Measure Date Newsom’s Vote Bay Guardian Recommendation

* Strengthen Campaign Finance Reform 4/24/00 NO YES

* Delay Living Wage 6/1/99 YES NO

* Support War On Iraq 10/7/02 YES NO

* Limiting ATM Fees 2/17/99 NO YES

* Lower Fines For Slumlords 10/31/97 YES NO (Tenants Union NO)

* Deny Eviction Defense Funds 7/24/00 YES NO (Tenants Union NO)

* Allow More Condo Conversions Fall 00 YES NO (Tenants Union NO)

* Ban Capital Improvement Rent Hikes Fall 00 NO YES (Tenants Union YES)

This event organized by a random group of individuals who support
all different mayoral candidates.